Inject a per-runable pretty printer into MatchersUtil

This will allow us to add support for custom object formatters, which
will be a per-runable resource like custom matchers, by injecting them
into the pretty-printer.
This commit is contained in:
Steve Gravrock
2019-10-08 22:57:07 -07:00
committed by Steve Gravrock
parent dec67bd535
commit 1f23f1e4d2
46 changed files with 546 additions and 401 deletions
+9 -3
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ describe('toBeInstanceOf', function() {
});
it('passes for NaN', function() {
var matcher = jasmineUnderTest.matchers.toBeInstanceOf();
var matcher = jasmineUnderTest.matchers.toBeInstanceOf({
pp: jasmineUnderTest.makePrettyPrinter()
});
var result = matcher.compare(NaN, Number);
expect(result).toEqual({
pass: true,
@@ -156,7 +158,9 @@ describe('toBeInstanceOf', function() {
it('passes for objects with no constructor', function() {
var object = Object.create(null);
var matcher = jasmineUnderTest.matchers.toBeInstanceOf();
var matcher = jasmineUnderTest.matchers.toBeInstanceOf({
pp: jasmineUnderTest.makePrettyPrinter()
});
var result = matcher.compare(object, Object);
expect(result).toEqual({
pass: true,
@@ -219,7 +223,9 @@ describe('toBeInstanceOf', function() {
});
it('raises an error if missing an expected value', function() {
var matcher = jasmineUnderTest.matchers.toBeInstanceOf();
var matcher = jasmineUnderTest.matchers.toBeInstanceOf({
pp: jasmineUnderTest.makePrettyPrinter()
});
expect(function() {
matcher.compare({}, undefined);
}).toThrowError('<toBeInstanceOf> : Expected value is not a constructor function\n' +