Add 0x2701/0x2702 to the list of valid ASCQ values we accept for devices
that are write protected.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
From the SPC-4 paragraph about WRITE SAME(10): "The WRITE SAME (10)
command requests that the device server transfer a single logical
block from the Data-Out Buffer [ ... ]". Hence always pass a data
buffer when sending a WRITE SAME(10) command.
Set the NDOB bit in the WRITE SAME(16) command if no data out buffer
is present.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
RFC 3720 is not clear about whether a target should return SUCCESS
or CHECK CONDITION if SPDTL > EDTL. Hence accept both. See also
Fred Knight, Re: [Ips] Data Out residual overflow/underflow handling,
IETF mailing list archive, 21 September 2012
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips/current/msg02756.html).
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Since writing headers and payload in a single iov has never been
implementend and after thinking about it several times seems to
be very hairy I would like to revert this change since
the original implementation is in O(1) while the changed one
is in O(n). This results in a complexity of O(n^2) instead of
O(n) for the whole send operation.
This reverts commit 06eab264f6.
clang defaults to c99 so remove inline statements
(http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#inline ) on functions shared
across different translation units.
clang's linker doesn't like major numbers over 255 so change how SOREL
is generated in Makefile.am.
The code that verifies the pr_type response must compare only the
lower four bits of byte 21 of the response ("TYPE") and must ignore
the upper four bits ("SCOPE").
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Add a simple test that it works or is not implemented.
Add a RCTD test to verify that with this flag clear we get command descriptors without CTDP set and with it set we get command descriptors with CTDP set and a timeout descriptor
Remove the size field as it is not used. If we would keep it
we would have to calculate it in scsi_task_set_iov_in/out which
would add unneccassry wals to the iovec array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Change iscsi_scsi_command_async() to write data-out using iovectors
attached to the scsi task structure instead of copying the data into
the buffer holding the header.
Still allow passing the data via an argument to the funtcion so that the
ABI does not change but then just conver the data to an iovector.
Update the write_to_socket functions to know about the iovectors and write them
as part of the pdu.
Convert write10_task to use iovectors.
This will allow 'zero-copy' writes through libiscsi.
However, as 'zero-copy writes does mean that we do more send() calls into
the kernel this may degrade performance for very small i/o.
A scsi write will not take at least 2 send() calls.
One send call for the iscsi header structure and a second send call for the
payload data.
This will be more expensive than the old memcpy() of payload data plus one send() call since the send() will be a lot more expensive than memcpy() of a small amount of data.
Ronnie Sahlberg