1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Warren
f8fba20890 Add Unraid feature comparison analysis
Document Purpose:
- Compare MarkBase vs Unraid features
- Define MarkBase positioning (Enterprise File Server + Backup Server)

Comparison Categories:
1. Storage Management (60% coverage)
   - Unraid JBOD + Parity  (unique)
   - MarkBase RAID-Z + VFS Backend 

2. File Services (250% coverage - MarkBase wins)
   - Unraid: SMB + NFS
   - MarkBase: SMB + SFTP + WebDAV + S3 

3. Docker/VM (0% - Unraid wins)
   - Unraid Docker Templates + KVM VM 

4. Backup (267% coverage - MarkBase wins)
   - Unraid: Plugin-based
   - MarkBase: BackupScheduler + Incremental 

5. Plugins (0% - Unraid wins)
   - Unraid 200+ Community Plugins 

6. Performance (200% - MarkBase wins)
   - SMB: MarkBase 3.0 GB/s vs Unraid 100 MB/s 
   - SSH: MarkBase 140 MB/s (Unraid not supported)

7. macOS Compatibility (250% - MarkBase wins)
   - AFP_AfpInfo + Time Machine 

Overall Coverage: 58% (focused on storage + backup)

Key Differences:
- Unraid: Home NAS + Docker/VM platform
- MarkBase: Enterprise file server + backup server

Co-deployment Options:
A. MarkBase as S3 backend for Unraid Docker
B. MarkBase as backup target for Unraid
C. MarkBase standalone (enterprise)

Deployment Comparison:
- Unraid: USB boot OS, $59-$129 license
- MarkBase: macOS/Linux app, open source (free)

User Recommendations:
- Home users → Unraid (Docker + VM)
- Small studio → Unraid (media storage)
- Developers → MarkBase (SSH + SFTP + S3)
- Small enterprise → MarkBase (multi-protocol + backup)

Next Phase 10 Suggestions:
- NFS support
- JBOD-like storage
- Disk monitoring (SMART)
- Webhook completion
2026-06-24 04:29:23 +08:00