warren/jasmine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 9 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update comments as requested

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mert Akinc
2024-08-05 12:27:11 -05:00
parent 36a6e2aa1d
commit 554dfd4923
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
src/core/ClearStack.js
View File

@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().clearStack = function(j$) {
global.process.versions &&
typeof global.process.versions.node === 'string';
// Windows builds of WebKit have a fairly generic user agent string when no application name is provided.
// See: https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/d898a3cffd9c992980016cb1fbdba272cb0c992d/Source/WebCore/platform/win/UserAgentWin.cpp#L37
// Windows builds of WebKit have a fairly generic user agent string when no application name is provided:
// e.g. "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko)"
const SAFARI_OR_WIN_WEBKIT =
global.navigator &&
/(^((?!chrome|android).)*safari)|(Win64; x64\) AppleWebKit\/[0-9.]+ \(KHTML, like Gecko\)$)/i.test(
@@ -84,8 +84,9 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().clearStack = function(j$) {
SAFARI_OR_WIN_WEBKIT ||
j$.util.isUndefined(global.MessageChannel) /* tests */
) {
// queueMicrotask is dramatically faster than MessageChannel in Safari,
// at least through version 16.
// queueMicrotask is dramatically faster than MessageChannel in Safari
// and other WebKit-based browsers, such as the one distributed by Playwright
// to test Safari-like behavior on Windows.
// Some of our own integration tests provide a mock queueMicrotask in all
// environments because it's simpler to mock than MessageChannel.
return browserQueueMicrotaskImpl(global);