Files
telfax/docs/TESSERACT_LICENSE_ANALYSIS.md
Warren 55bca92691 V1.0: Class 1 fax — real-world 4-page send to external number confirmed
Core features:
- Class 1 T.30 protocol: full send/receive implementation
- HDLC: DLE-stuffing, FCS strip, USR5637 bit-reversal handling
- T.4 MH encoder/decoder (1728px A4 standard)
- Document pipeline: PDF (Ghostscript), PNG, TIFF input
- Width clamping: US Letter 1734px → 1728px fax standard
- Cover page: CJK rasterization (TW/CN/JP/EN), TIFF + HTML output
- OCR verification: Tesseract 5 with eng+chi_tra, CJK space-tolerant
- API server (axum): health, send, jobs, cover, retry, cancel
- Background worker: auto-poll queue, speed fallback, retry policy
- Modem detection, pool management

Real-world test results (2026-07-23):
- V90 → 25153038: 4 pages, V.17 12000 bps, 2:33 ✅
- USR5637 → 25153038: 4 pages, V.17 12000 bps, 2:26 ✅
- Both faxes confirmed received on remote machine

Tested: loopback (100% pixel match), multi-page, all input formats,
cover pages, OCR verify, API endpoints, worker processing.
13 unit tests pass, 0 new clippy warnings.
2026-07-24 18:47:15 +08:00

7.0 KiB

Tesseract OCR License Analysis

License Type: Apache License 2.0

✅ Yes, can use for business!

Tesseract OCR is licensed under Apache License 2.0, which is a permissive open-source license similar to MIT License.


Apache License 2.0 vs MIT License

Similarities

Feature Apache 2.0 MIT Commercial Use
Commercial use ✅ YES ✅ YES ✅ Both allow
Modification ✅ YES ✅ YES ✅ Both allow
Distribution ✅ YES ✅ YES ✅ Both allow
Private use ✅ YES ✅ YES ✅ Both allow
Sublicensing ✅ YES ✅ YES ✅ Both allow
No royalty ✅ YES ✅ YES ✅ Both allow

Key Differences

Feature Apache 2.0 MIT Business Impact
Patent grant ✅ Explicit patent protection ❌ No explicit patent clause ✅ Apache 2.0 safer for business
Attribution ✅ Required ✅ Required ✅ Both require
License notice ✅ Must keep license file ✅ Must keep license file ✅ Both require
State changes ✅ Must document modifications ❌ Not required ✅ Apache 2.0 more transparent
Patent litigation ✅ License terminates if you sue ❌ No such clause ✅ Apache 2.0 protects contributors
NOTICE file ✅ Must include if present ❌ Not required ✅ Apache 2.0 respects attribution

Business Usage Rights

✅ What You CAN Do

  1. Commercial Use

    • Use Tesseract in commercial products
    • Sell products that use Tesseract
    • Charge for services using Tesseract
    • Use in proprietary software
  2. Distribution

    • Distribute Tesseract with your software
    • Bundle Tesseract in your application
    • Include in SaaS offerings
    • Redistribute modified versions
  3. Modification

    • Modify source code
    • Create derivative works
    • Fork the project
    • Add proprietary extensions
  4. Integration

    • Integrate into commercial systems
    • Use in enterprise fax servers
    • Include in paid services
    • Embed in hardware products
  5. Patent Protection

    • Apache 2.0 grants explicit patent license
    • Contributors cannot sue you for patent infringement
    • Safe for commercial deployment

Requirements (Very Minimal)

✅ What You MUST Do

  1. Keep License File

    Include the Apache License 2.0 text
    
  2. Keep Copyright Notice

    Copyright [year] Google Inc. and others
    Licensed under Apache License 2.0
    
  3. Document Changes (if modified)

    State significant changes to the code
    
  4. Include NOTICE File (if present)

    If Tesseract has a NOTICE file, you must include it
    

Example Compliance

For Telfax Project

✅ Proper Compliance:

/*
 * Copyright 2024 Telfax Contributors
 * 
 * OCR processing using Tesseract OCR
 * 
 * Tesseract OCR Copyright Google Inc. and others
 * Licensed under Apache License 2.0
 * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 * 
 * Telfax is licensed under MIT License
 */

✅ Commercial Distribution:

# Package structure
telfax-server/
├── LICENSE                  # MIT License (your project)
├── THIRD-PARTY-LICENSES    # Apache License 2.0 (Tesseract)
│   ├── tesseract.txt       # Apache License 2.0
│   ├── leptonica.txt       # (if needed)
│   └── ...
├── NOTICE                  # If Tesseract has one
└── README.md               # Mention Tesseract usage

Comparison Summary

License Type Commercial Use Patent Safety Business Risk
Apache 2.0 ✅ YES ✅ High ✅ Very Low
MIT ✅ YES ❌ Medium ✅ Low
GPL ❌ No (must open source) ✅ High ❌ High
Proprietary ✅ YES ❌ None ❌ Very High

Apache 2.0 is actually BETTER for business than MIT because:

  • ✅ Explicit patent protection
  • ✅ Cannot be sued for patent infringement by contributors
  • ✅ Clear commercial use rights
  • ✅ Widely used by major corporations (Google, Microsoft, etc.)

Real-World Examples

Companies Using Tesseract

  1. Google

    • Original developer of Tesseract
    • Uses in Google Docs OCR
    • Commercial product
  2. Adobe

    • Uses OCR in Acrobat
    • Commercial PDF tools
    • Apache 2.0 compliant
  3. Microsoft

    • Uses in OneNote OCR
    • Commercial Office suite
    • Apache 2.0 compliant
  4. Small Businesses

    • Document scanning services
    • Invoice processing systems
    • Fax server applications
    • All commercially viable

Telfax Commercial Deployment

✅ Business Model Options

1. On-Premise Enterprise Fax Server

- Sell server installation
- Include Tesseract for OCR
- Apache 2.0 compliant
- ✅ ALLOWED

2. Cloud Fax Service (SaaS)

- Offer cloud fax + OCR
- Charge subscription fees
- Use Tesseract backend
- ✅ ALLOWED

3. OEM Integration

- Bundle with other products
- Sell to hardware vendors
- Include OCR feature
- ✅ ALLOWED

4. Consulting Services

- Deploy fax + OCR systems
- Charge service fees
- Custom integration
- ✅ ALLOWED

✅ Requirements for Commercial Use

  • ✅ Include Apache License 2.0 text
  • ✅ Keep copyright notices
  • ✅ Document modifications (if any)
  • ✅ Include NOTICE file (if exists)
  • ✅ Don't remove existing attributions

✅ What You DON'T Need

  • ❌ Don't need to pay royalties
  • ❌ Don't need to open source your code
  • ❌ Don't need to share modifications
  • ❌ Don't need to contribute back
  • ❌ Don't need special permission

Conclusion

✅ Tesseract OCR is PERFECT for Business!

Key Points:

  1. ✅ Apache License 2.0 allows full commercial use
  2. ✅ Better than MIT for business (explicit patent protection)
  3. ✅ Used by Fortune 500 companies (Google, Adobe, Microsoft)
  4. ✅ No royalties or fees required
  5. ✅ Can sell products using Tesseract
  6. ✅ Can modify and distribute commercially
  7. ✅ Patent safe - contributors cannot sue

Comparison with MIT:

  • Apache 2.0 = MIT + Patent Protection
  • Both allow commercial use
  • Apache 2.0 is preferred for enterprise software

Telfax Commercial Deployment:

  • ✅ Use Tesseract for OCR in fax receiver
  • ✅ Sell as enterprise fax server
  • ✅ Include in SaaS offering
  • ✅ Bundle with hardware solutions
  • ✅ All perfectly legal under Apache 2.0

References


Final Answer: YES, Tesseract OCR (Apache 2.0) can be used for business, and is actually safer than MIT License for commercial deployment! ✅